REACTOR Product Guide
Is REACTOR right for your operation?
REACTOR brings safety, people, work, assets and operational decisions into one connected environment. Explore what the platform includes, how it differs from traditional EHS software and how it can fit the way your organization actually works.
Platform definition
What is REACTOR?
REACTOR is an operational safety and readiness platform for planning, controlling and improving safety-critical work.
It combines familiar capabilities such as checklists, inspections, risk assessments, permits, incident investigations and audits with the operational context those records depend on: people, contractors, projects, vessels, locations, equipment, competencies, documents and decisions.
The result is not simply a collection of digital forms. It is a connected operational picture of the work.
Browse direct answers
PULSE
People & competence
ATLAS
Places & assets
PRISM
Projects & work
VAULT
Documents & evidence
TRIDENT
Marine operations
Central operational safety core
Safety Hazard & Risk Dashboard
Permits, incidents, risk, audits, checklists, observations and actions use the same operational picture.
Product fit selector
Start with the operational problem.
Select the situation closest to your operation. The response is guidance, not an automated sales qualification.
Recommended starting point
We rely heavily on spreadsheets and documents.
REACTOR can turn operational registers and document-driven handoffs into governed workflows while keeping controlled evidence connected to the work.
Relevant foundations
- VAULT evidence
- SHARD workflows
- ATLAS operational context
Practical first step
Choose one high-friction register or approval workflow and map its decisions, owners and evidence.
Product questions
Direct answers for operational teams.
Search by problem, process or platform core. Answers distinguish current capability from configuration and implementation choices.
36 answers shown
Understanding REACTORWhat is REACTOR?
An operational safety and readiness platform for complex, high-risk work.
REACTOR connects safety processes to the people, companies, projects, vessels, locations, equipment, evidence and decisions involved in the work. It provides a connected operational picture rather than a collection of isolated records.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, PRISM, VAULT, TRIDENT
Understanding REACTORIs REACTOR an EHS management system?
Yes, with a broader operational foundation.
REACTOR includes core EHS capabilities such as risk management, incident investigation, audits, inspections, corrective actions and compliance workflows. It is designed more broadly to connect those processes directly to the operation and the people, companies, assets and work involved.
Related platform cores: SHARD
Understanding REACTORIs REACTOR just another safety application?
No. Familiar safety functions operate on shared operational context.
REACTOR includes the functions users expect from safety software, but it is not built as disconnected forms and registers. Risks, permits, people, companies, locations, equipment, evidence and decisions can remain connected around the work.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS
Understanding REACTORWhat is an operational safety and readiness platform?
A system that helps teams understand whether work is ready and how it can be controlled.
It brings together the work scope, hazards, controls, people, competence, contractors, locations, equipment, timing and evidence needed to make sound operational decisions before, during and after execution.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, PRISM
Understanding REACTORIs REACTOR one application or several modules?
It is one connected platform with focused operational applications.
Applications such as SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, PRISM, VAULT and TRIDENT focus on distinct responsibilities while sharing operational context. Organizations can begin with a focused scope and expand without creating another disconnected data island.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, PRISM, VAULT, TRIDENT
Understanding REACTORWhat makes REACTOR different from traditional EHS software?
REACTOR begins with the operation, not only the EHS process.
Traditional EHS systems often organize work around forms, records, sites and compliance processes. REACTOR begins with the changing operation: projects, campaigns, companies, people, vessels, locations, equipment, work scopes and the decisions required to execute safely.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, PRISM
Checklists, inspections and auditsDoes REACTOR include checklists?
Yes. Checklists support repeatable inspections, audits and operational checks.
A checklist result can remain connected to its location, equipment, project, responsible party, evidence, finding and corrective action instead of ending as a standalone submission.
Related platform cores: SHARD
Checklists, inspections and auditsDoes REACTOR include inspections and audits?
Yes. Teams can structure verification, findings, evidence and follow-up.
REACTOR supports repeatable inspection and audit workflows with accountable findings and evidence. The operational context behind each verification can remain available for review and action.
Related platform cores: SHARD, VAULT
Incidents and corrective actionsDoes REACTOR support incident reporting and investigation?
Yes. Events can progress from initial report through investigation and learning.
The incident record can retain the people, companies, project, location, equipment, work, evidence, causes and actions relevant to the event, helping investigators understand what was happening operationally.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, VAULT
Incidents and corrective actionsDoes REACTOR include corrective actions?
Yes. Actions can be assigned, tracked, evidenced and verified.
Corrective actions can retain ownership, due dates, source context, supporting evidence and closure verification so follow-up remains accountable and traceable.
Related platform cores: SHARD, VAULT
Incidents and corrective actionsCan findings remain connected to the original inspection or incident?
Yes. Source records, findings, evidence and actions can remain linked.
This connection helps reviewers understand why an action exists, what evidence supports it and whether closure addresses the original issue rather than only completing a task.
Related platform cores: SHARD, VAULT
Risk assessments and permitsDoes REACTOR include permit-to-work?
Yes. REACTOR supports traceable operational permitting.
Permits can connect to risk assessments, work locations, equipment, contractors, competencies, supporting documents, controls and approvals. The objective is not only to digitize a permit form, but to support a controlled work process.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, VAULT
Risk assessments and permitsCan risk assessments connect to permits and work activities?
Yes. Risk decisions can remain tied to the work they control.
Assessments can be considered alongside the activity, permit, location, equipment, people, documents and changing operating conditions, providing more useful context than a detached assessment record.
Related platform cores: SHARD, ATLAS, PRISM
People, companies and competenceCan REACTOR support operational readiness?
Yes. Readiness combines work, workforce, context, controls and evidence.
Teams can evaluate whether the people, competence, companies, work scope, location, equipment, documents, risks and approvals needed for execution are in place.
Related platform cores: PULSE, SHARD, ATLAS, PRISM, VAULT
People, companies and competenceCan REACTOR manage contractor and worker readiness?
Yes. People, companies, qualifications and training can inform readiness.
PULSE provides the people, organization, credential, qualification and training context that SHARD workflows can use when determining whether participants are prepared and authorized for the work.
Related platform cores: PULSE, SHARD
Projects, vessels, locations and equipmentCan REACTOR model sites, vessels, locations and equipment?
Yes. Operational records can use structured place and asset context.
ATLAS provides location, spatial, system and equipment context, while TRIDENT adds vessel and marine-operational context. The model can reflect where work and risk exist without reducing everything to a single site field.
Related platform cores: ATLAS, TRIDENT
Projects, vessels, locations and equipmentCan REACTOR support multi-company projects and campaigns?
Yes. The platform is designed for contractor-led and multi-company operations.
Shared work can be coordinated while role-aware access and company context determine what each participant can see and do. The exact collaboration model is configured around the operational and governance requirements.
Related platform cores: PULSE, PRISM, SHARD
Replacing existing toolsCan REACTOR replace SafetyCulture?
It may replace checklist-focused platforms when connected operational control is required.
REACTOR includes checklists, inspections, audits and evidence capture. Organizations that only need rapid checklist deployment may prefer a dedicated checklist product. Organizations that need those activities connected to risk, permits, incidents, people, contractors, projects, locations and equipment should evaluate REACTOR.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS
Replacing existing toolsDoes REACTOR need to replace all our existing systems?
No. A focused deployment can coexist with authoritative specialist systems.
The implementation should identify which decisions and workflows REACTOR should own, which information should be referenced or integrated, and which established systems should remain authoritative.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE, ATLAS, VAULT
Security, access and integrationCan REACTOR integrate with specialist systems?
Integration is evaluated around clear ownership, security and operational value.
Where an established HR, finance, maintenance, engineering or document system should remain authoritative, REACTOR can be configured to exchange or reference the information needed by operational workflows. Integration scope depends on the available interfaces and governance.
Related platform cores: PULSE, ATLAS, VAULT
Implementation and adoptionCan organizations start with one problem or module?
Yes. REACTOR supports focused adoption and progressive expansion.
A team can begin with a clear operational problem such as permitting, incident management, inspections or workforce readiness, establish the required context and expand as value and adoption are demonstrated.
Related platform cores: SHARD, PULSE
Commercial modelIs REACTOR only for large enterprises?
No. The scope can fit a focused project team or a wider organization.
The appropriate deployment depends on operational complexity, governance and the processes being addressed rather than company size alone. Enterprise capability does not require an enterprise-wide first rollout.
Commercial modelIs REACTOR suitable for small project teams?
Yes, where the team needs structured control without excessive administration.
A small team can use a focused REACTOR scope to coordinate work, evidence and accountability. Configuration should remain proportionate to the operation rather than reproduce enterprise bureaucracy.
Implementation and adoptionDoes REACTOR force us into a fixed workflow?
No. Governed structures can be configured around the operating model.
Authority, traceability and required controls remain governed, while workflow stages, terminology, responsibilities and context can be configured to reflect how the organization actually works.
Implementation and adoptionCan REACTOR adapt between projects, vessels and campaigns?
Yes. Context and configuration can reflect different operating structures.
Projects, campaigns, vessels, sites and phases of work can require different participants, locations, controls and evidence. REACTOR is designed to preserve governance while allowing that operational context to change.
Related platform cores: PRISM, TRIDENT, ATLAS, SHARD
Implementation and adoptionHow is REACTOR implemented?
Implementation begins with the operation and a clearly bounded problem.
CERB works with the team to understand decisions, responsibilities, context and evidence; configure the solution; onboard users; launch with the operation; and improve the deployment based on real use.
Implementation and adoptionHow long does implementation take?
It depends on scope, data readiness, integrations and governance.
A focused workflow can be introduced more quickly than a multi-company platform rollout. CERB defines the implementation plan after understanding the operational scope and dependencies rather than publishing a generic duration.
Security, access and integrationHow is customer data separated?
REACTOR uses tenant-aware data boundaries and controlled access patterns.
Customer and organization context is enforced through the platform data model and role-aware access controls. Specific security, hosting and integration requirements are reviewed during implementation.
Security, access and integrationCan different companies collaborate without seeing everything?
Yes. Collaboration can be scoped by company, role, project and responsibility.
Participants can be given access to the workflows and information required for their role without making the wider tenant or another company's records generally visible.
Security, access and integrationDoes REACTOR support controlled access?
Yes. Access is role-aware and can reflect operational responsibility.
Permissions and workflow authority can distinguish who may view, contribute, review, approve or administer information. The final access model is configured and tested against the customer's governance requirements.
Security, access and integrationDoes REACTOR provide traceability and audit history?
Yes. Operational decisions and evidence are designed to remain attributable.
Relevant workflows preserve ownership, status, approvals, supporting evidence and change history so teams can understand what was decided, by whom and on what basis.
Related platform cores: SHARD, VAULT
Commercial modelHow is REACTOR licensed?
Licensing is aligned to deployment scope and operational needs.
REACTOR supports focused entry options and configured enterprise deployments. CERB defines commercial terms against the selected workflows, users, operational context, implementation and support requirements without publishing invented one-size-fits-all pricing.
Commercial modelCan we start with a limited deployment?
Yes. Start with what is needed and expand as the operation grows.
A limited deployment can focus on one team, project, campaign or process. The starting scope should still establish the operational context needed to avoid creating another isolated tool.
Commercial modelCan REACTOR be configured around our operation?
Yes, within governed platform structures.
CERB configures workflows, terminology, responsibilities and context around the real operation while protecting security, traceability, maintainability and the integrity of the wider platform.
Commercial modelWhat happens when a required capability does not yet exist?
CERB examines the operational problem before deciding whether and how to build.
We first examine the decisions users need to make and how the capability should connect to the wider platform. Where the requirement provides real operational value, we can design and build it together without turning REACTOR into an uncontrolled collection of customer-specific features. Not every request is automatically added.
Compare the foundation
Features matter. The operating model beneath them matters more.
See how REACTOR differs from checklist tools, configurable QHSE systems, enterprise EHS suites and disconnected workplace tools.
A practical next step
Discuss the operation before discussing the software.
Tell us how work is planned, authorized and executed today. We will help identify a proportionate starting point and the operational context it needs.